A Different Kind of Disadvantage: Candidate Race, Cognitive Complexity, and Voter Choice

Melody Crowder-Meyer, Shana Kushner Gadarian, Jessica Trounstine, Kau Vue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Voters use heuristics to help them make decisions when they lack information about political choices. Candidate appearance operates as a powerful low-information cue. However, widely held stereotypes mean that reliance on such a heuristic can reduce support for candidates of color. We argue that racial prejudices are more likely to dominate decision making when electoral environments require voters to expend more cognitive resources—such as when they must choose multiple candidates at once. Using two experiments we find that black candidates receive less support from cognitively taxed voters than from voters who have the cognitive space to intentionally limit their prejudices when voting. We also reveal that this pattern is particularly evident among ideologically liberal voters. Respondents who profess politically liberal views support black candidates more often than white candidates when the cognitive task is simple but are less likely to do so when they are cognitively taxed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPolitical Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

voter
candidacy
prejudice
heuristics
voting
stereotype
decision making
lack
experiment

Keywords

  • Cognitive complexity
  • Experiment
  • Heuristics
  • Local politics
  • Race
  • Voter behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

A Different Kind of Disadvantage : Candidate Race, Cognitive Complexity, and Voter Choice. / Crowder-Meyer, Melody; Gadarian, Shana Kushner; Trounstine, Jessica; Vue, Kau.

In: Political Behavior, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6371305706e4a1aa5999af7db5e7033,
title = "A Different Kind of Disadvantage: Candidate Race, Cognitive Complexity, and Voter Choice",
abstract = "Voters use heuristics to help them make decisions when they lack information about political choices. Candidate appearance operates as a powerful low-information cue. However, widely held stereotypes mean that reliance on such a heuristic can reduce support for candidates of color. We argue that racial prejudices are more likely to dominate decision making when electoral environments require voters to expend more cognitive resources—such as when they must choose multiple candidates at once. Using two experiments we find that black candidates receive less support from cognitively taxed voters than from voters who have the cognitive space to intentionally limit their prejudices when voting. We also reveal that this pattern is particularly evident among ideologically liberal voters. Respondents who profess politically liberal views support black candidates more often than white candidates when the cognitive task is simple but are less likely to do so when they are cognitively taxed.",
keywords = "Cognitive complexity, Experiment, Heuristics, Local politics, Race, Voter behavior",
author = "Melody Crowder-Meyer and Gadarian, {Shana Kushner} and Jessica Trounstine and Kau Vue",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11109-018-9505-1",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Different Kind of Disadvantage

T2 - Candidate Race, Cognitive Complexity, and Voter Choice

AU - Crowder-Meyer, Melody

AU - Gadarian, Shana Kushner

AU - Trounstine, Jessica

AU - Vue, Kau

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Voters use heuristics to help them make decisions when they lack information about political choices. Candidate appearance operates as a powerful low-information cue. However, widely held stereotypes mean that reliance on such a heuristic can reduce support for candidates of color. We argue that racial prejudices are more likely to dominate decision making when electoral environments require voters to expend more cognitive resources—such as when they must choose multiple candidates at once. Using two experiments we find that black candidates receive less support from cognitively taxed voters than from voters who have the cognitive space to intentionally limit their prejudices when voting. We also reveal that this pattern is particularly evident among ideologically liberal voters. Respondents who profess politically liberal views support black candidates more often than white candidates when the cognitive task is simple but are less likely to do so when they are cognitively taxed.

AB - Voters use heuristics to help them make decisions when they lack information about political choices. Candidate appearance operates as a powerful low-information cue. However, widely held stereotypes mean that reliance on such a heuristic can reduce support for candidates of color. We argue that racial prejudices are more likely to dominate decision making when electoral environments require voters to expend more cognitive resources—such as when they must choose multiple candidates at once. Using two experiments we find that black candidates receive less support from cognitively taxed voters than from voters who have the cognitive space to intentionally limit their prejudices when voting. We also reveal that this pattern is particularly evident among ideologically liberal voters. Respondents who profess politically liberal views support black candidates more often than white candidates when the cognitive task is simple but are less likely to do so when they are cognitively taxed.

KW - Cognitive complexity

KW - Experiment

KW - Heuristics

KW - Local politics

KW - Race

KW - Voter behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055445829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055445829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-018-9505-1

DO - 10.1007/s11109-018-9505-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055445829

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

ER -