TY - JOUR
T1 - A Diagnostic Analysis of Low-Impact Development Simulations with SWMM
AU - Worthen, Lucie
AU - Kelleher, Christa
AU - Davidson, Cliff Ian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Green infrastructure (GI) aims to mitigate the impacts of imperviousness by storing and slowing the flow of water through urbanized landscapes. Green roofs, one type of GI, are widely simulated using the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) but are rarely evaluated using diagnostic analyses. In this study, we utilize frugal diagnostic analyses to investigate potential sources of nonlinearity, uncertainty, and equifinality within SWMM applied to a particular case study: event-based modeling of a large green roof in Syracuse, New York. Our findings highlight the major sources of uncertainty in SWMM-inputs, parameters, structural equations, and reconciling differences between simulated outputs versus observed variables-And demonstrate that more complex diagnostic analysis is necessary to fully understand the fundamental drivers of, and interactions among, sources of uncertainty. When assessing diagnostics in terms of outputs, we achieved strong agreement between simulated and observed runoff but were not able to replicate observed storage time series during simulation. This suggests that common approaches to calibrate only to wet times may misrepresent key hydrologic storages and fluxes within the model.
AB - Green infrastructure (GI) aims to mitigate the impacts of imperviousness by storing and slowing the flow of water through urbanized landscapes. Green roofs, one type of GI, are widely simulated using the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) but are rarely evaluated using diagnostic analyses. In this study, we utilize frugal diagnostic analyses to investigate potential sources of nonlinearity, uncertainty, and equifinality within SWMM applied to a particular case study: event-based modeling of a large green roof in Syracuse, New York. Our findings highlight the major sources of uncertainty in SWMM-inputs, parameters, structural equations, and reconciling differences between simulated outputs versus observed variables-And demonstrate that more complex diagnostic analysis is necessary to fully understand the fundamental drivers of, and interactions among, sources of uncertainty. When assessing diagnostics in terms of outputs, we achieved strong agreement between simulated and observed runoff but were not able to replicate observed storage time series during simulation. This suggests that common approaches to calibrate only to wet times may misrepresent key hydrologic storages and fluxes within the model.
KW - Calibration
KW - Diagnostic analysis
KW - Green roof
KW - Low-impact development
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Storm Water Management Model (SWMM)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122624451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122624451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000976
DO - 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000976
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122624451
SN - 2379-6111
VL - 8
JO - Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
JF - Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
IS - 2
ER -