A comparison of performance feedback procedures on teachers' treatment implementation integrity and students' inappropriate behavior in special education classrooms

Florence D. DiGennaro, Brian K Martens, Ava E. Kleinmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the extent to which treatment integrity of 4 special education teachers was affected by goal setting, performance feedback regarding student or teacher performance, and a meeting cancellation contingency. Teachers were trained to implement function-based treatment packages to address student problem behavior. In one condition, teachers set a goal for student behavior and received daily written feedback about student performance. In a second condition, teachers received daily written feedback about student performance as well as their own accuracy in implementing the intervention and would be able to avoid meeting with a consultant to practice missed steps by implementing the intervention with 100% integrity. This latter package increased treatment integrity the most above baseline levels. Higher levels of treatment integrity were significantly correlated with lower levels of student problem behavior for 3 of the 4 teacher-student dyads. Three of the 4 teachers also rated both feedback procedures as highly acceptable. Implications for increasing and maintaining treatment integrity by teachers via a consultation model are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-461
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Special Education
special education
integrity
Students
classroom
teacher
performance
student
Therapeutics
Consultants
Integrity
dyad
contingency
student teacher
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • Avoidance contingency
  • Directed rehearsal
  • Feedback
  • Functional behavior assessment
  • Special education
  • Treatment integrity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{4040aacb2bca43ac88338d1c9a27da4a,
title = "A comparison of performance feedback procedures on teachers' treatment implementation integrity and students' inappropriate behavior in special education classrooms",
abstract = "This study examined the extent to which treatment integrity of 4 special education teachers was affected by goal setting, performance feedback regarding student or teacher performance, and a meeting cancellation contingency. Teachers were trained to implement function-based treatment packages to address student problem behavior. In one condition, teachers set a goal for student behavior and received daily written feedback about student performance. In a second condition, teachers received daily written feedback about student performance as well as their own accuracy in implementing the intervention and would be able to avoid meeting with a consultant to practice missed steps by implementing the intervention with 100{\%} integrity. This latter package increased treatment integrity the most above baseline levels. Higher levels of treatment integrity were significantly correlated with lower levels of student problem behavior for 3 of the 4 teacher-student dyads. Three of the 4 teachers also rated both feedback procedures as highly acceptable. Implications for increasing and maintaining treatment integrity by teachers via a consultation model are discussed.",
keywords = "Avoidance contingency, Directed rehearsal, Feedback, Functional behavior assessment, Special education, Treatment integrity",
author = "DiGennaro, {Florence D.} and Martens, {Brian K} and Kleinmann, {Ava E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.2007.40-447",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "447--461",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of performance feedback procedures on teachers' treatment implementation integrity and students' inappropriate behavior in special education classrooms

AU - DiGennaro, Florence D.

AU - Martens, Brian K

AU - Kleinmann, Ava E.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - This study examined the extent to which treatment integrity of 4 special education teachers was affected by goal setting, performance feedback regarding student or teacher performance, and a meeting cancellation contingency. Teachers were trained to implement function-based treatment packages to address student problem behavior. In one condition, teachers set a goal for student behavior and received daily written feedback about student performance. In a second condition, teachers received daily written feedback about student performance as well as their own accuracy in implementing the intervention and would be able to avoid meeting with a consultant to practice missed steps by implementing the intervention with 100% integrity. This latter package increased treatment integrity the most above baseline levels. Higher levels of treatment integrity were significantly correlated with lower levels of student problem behavior for 3 of the 4 teacher-student dyads. Three of the 4 teachers also rated both feedback procedures as highly acceptable. Implications for increasing and maintaining treatment integrity by teachers via a consultation model are discussed.

AB - This study examined the extent to which treatment integrity of 4 special education teachers was affected by goal setting, performance feedback regarding student or teacher performance, and a meeting cancellation contingency. Teachers were trained to implement function-based treatment packages to address student problem behavior. In one condition, teachers set a goal for student behavior and received daily written feedback about student performance. In a second condition, teachers received daily written feedback about student performance as well as their own accuracy in implementing the intervention and would be able to avoid meeting with a consultant to practice missed steps by implementing the intervention with 100% integrity. This latter package increased treatment integrity the most above baseline levels. Higher levels of treatment integrity were significantly correlated with lower levels of student problem behavior for 3 of the 4 teacher-student dyads. Three of the 4 teachers also rated both feedback procedures as highly acceptable. Implications for increasing and maintaining treatment integrity by teachers via a consultation model are discussed.

KW - Avoidance contingency

KW - Directed rehearsal

KW - Feedback

KW - Functional behavior assessment

KW - Special education

KW - Treatment integrity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38449119706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38449119706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-447

DO - 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-447

M3 - Article

C2 - 17970259

AN - SCOPUS:38449119706

VL - 40

SP - 447

EP - 461

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 3

ER -