TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of cryogel scaffolds to identify an appropriate structure for promoting bone regeneration
AU - Hixon, K. R.
AU - Eberlin, C. T.
AU - Kadakia, P. U.
AU - McBride-Gagyi, S. H.
AU - Jain, E.
AU - Sell, S. A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/5/27
Y1 - 2016/5/27
N2 - To create an ideal graft substitute for regenerating bone, the scaffold should possess osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties. Hydrogels areavery common scaffold, but the mechanical integrity and nanoporous structure are not advantageous for bone regeneration. Cryogelation is a techniqueinwhich the controlled freezing and thawing of a polymer createsaspongy, macroporous structure with ideal structural characteristics and promising mechanical stability. Hydrogels and cryogels of three different materials (chitosan-gelatin, N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone, and silk fibroin (SF)) were compared to assess the optimal material and form of scaffold for this application. Cryogel and hydrogel structures were tested in parallel to evaluate porosity, swelling, mechanical integrity, cellular infiltration, and mineralization potential. Cryogels proved superior to hydrogels based on swelling potential and mechanical properties. Among the cryogels,SFdemonstrated high pore diameter and area, mineralization upon cellular infiltration, and the largest presence of osteocalcin, a marker of bone formation. These results demonstrate the practicality of cryogels for a bone regeneration application and identify SF as a potential material choice.
AB - To create an ideal graft substitute for regenerating bone, the scaffold should possess osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties. Hydrogels areavery common scaffold, but the mechanical integrity and nanoporous structure are not advantageous for bone regeneration. Cryogelation is a techniqueinwhich the controlled freezing and thawing of a polymer createsaspongy, macroporous structure with ideal structural characteristics and promising mechanical stability. Hydrogels and cryogels of three different materials (chitosan-gelatin, N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone, and silk fibroin (SF)) were compared to assess the optimal material and form of scaffold for this application. Cryogel and hydrogel structures were tested in parallel to evaluate porosity, swelling, mechanical integrity, cellular infiltration, and mineralization potential. Cryogels proved superior to hydrogels based on swelling potential and mechanical properties. Among the cryogels,SFdemonstrated high pore diameter and area, mineralization upon cellular infiltration, and the largest presence of osteocalcin, a marker of bone formation. These results demonstrate the practicality of cryogels for a bone regeneration application and identify SF as a potential material choice.
KW - Bone regeneration
KW - Cryogel
KW - Hydrogel
KW - Scaffold
KW - Tissue engineering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011354170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011354170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/2057-1976/2/3/035014
DO - 10.1088/2057-1976/2/3/035014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85011354170
SN - 2057-1976
VL - 2
JO - Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express
JF - Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express
IS - 3
M1 - 035014
ER -