A cheap ticket to the dance: Systematic bias in college basketball's ratings percentage index

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A contest model is constructed to examine the existence of conference bias in college basketball's Ratings Percentage Index (RPI). Though a general RPI bias has been identified in previous literature, this is the first study to address whether the bias is random or systematic in nature. Within the theoretical model, the RPI is shown to be systematically biased against teams in high ability conferences, even when all teams play to expectation and can be transitively compared. Further, the bias can prevent the RPI from producing an ordinal mapping from revealed team ability level to the real number line. Given the longevity of the controversial RPI as the NCAA's primary measure of team ability, these results may indicate that the NCAA is serving a demand for team heterogeneity in selecting for the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEconomics Bulletin
Volume4
Issue number34
StatePublished - Sep 12 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rating
Dance
Basketball
Tournament
Contests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

A cheap ticket to the dance : Systematic bias in college basketball's ratings percentage index. / Sanders, Shane.

In: Economics Bulletin, Vol. 4, No. 34, 12.09.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d79b44ecd0074468a2cecdf48cc6eb9b,
title = "A cheap ticket to the dance: Systematic bias in college basketball's ratings percentage index",
abstract = "A contest model is constructed to examine the existence of conference bias in college basketball's Ratings Percentage Index (RPI). Though a general RPI bias has been identified in previous literature, this is the first study to address whether the bias is random or systematic in nature. Within the theoretical model, the RPI is shown to be systematically biased against teams in high ability conferences, even when all teams play to expectation and can be transitively compared. Further, the bias can prevent the RPI from producing an ordinal mapping from revealed team ability level to the real number line. Given the longevity of the controversial RPI as the NCAA's primary measure of team ability, these results may indicate that the NCAA is serving a demand for team heterogeneity in selecting for the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament.",
author = "Shane Sanders",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Economics Bulletin",
issn = "1545-2921",
publisher = "Economics Bulletin",
number = "34",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cheap ticket to the dance

T2 - Systematic bias in college basketball's ratings percentage index

AU - Sanders, Shane

PY - 2007/9/12

Y1 - 2007/9/12

N2 - A contest model is constructed to examine the existence of conference bias in college basketball's Ratings Percentage Index (RPI). Though a general RPI bias has been identified in previous literature, this is the first study to address whether the bias is random or systematic in nature. Within the theoretical model, the RPI is shown to be systematically biased against teams in high ability conferences, even when all teams play to expectation and can be transitively compared. Further, the bias can prevent the RPI from producing an ordinal mapping from revealed team ability level to the real number line. Given the longevity of the controversial RPI as the NCAA's primary measure of team ability, these results may indicate that the NCAA is serving a demand for team heterogeneity in selecting for the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament.

AB - A contest model is constructed to examine the existence of conference bias in college basketball's Ratings Percentage Index (RPI). Though a general RPI bias has been identified in previous literature, this is the first study to address whether the bias is random or systematic in nature. Within the theoretical model, the RPI is shown to be systematically biased against teams in high ability conferences, even when all teams play to expectation and can be transitively compared. Further, the bias can prevent the RPI from producing an ordinal mapping from revealed team ability level to the real number line. Given the longevity of the controversial RPI as the NCAA's primary measure of team ability, these results may indicate that the NCAA is serving a demand for team heterogeneity in selecting for the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36849051178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36849051178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36849051178

VL - 4

JO - Economics Bulletin

JF - Economics Bulletin

SN - 1545-2921

IS - 34

ER -